Those who spent the last four years convinced there was election interference are now saying there's no way it the election could be rigged.
For more than a century America was the gold standard for participatory democracy. Today, November 6, 2020, the rest of the world is aghast at how inept our election system has become. Countries across Europe shake their heads in disbelief at the idea that you don’t have to show identification to vote in this country. Voter fraud has come out of the shadows has been practiced in broad daylight, as if those perpetrating the fraud are daring Americans to challenge them. Crooked, politically biased judges, law enforcement, governors and secretaries of state either look the other way or actively participate in adulterating the election process to ensure that their favored candidate wins.
The stakes are high, and the reward even higher. United States of America is both the largest economy and the largest military power in the world. The difference between a favorable and unfavorable government could mean hundreds of billions of dollars of profits or losses to foreign interests and domestic corporations. Investing billions or tens of billions of dollars to guarantee a favorable outcome is a cheap price to pay for an unscrupulous stakeholder. The rank-and-file American people cannot compete against the forces arrayed at getting a predetermined outcome from our election.
“Accuse the other side of that which you are guilty.” This rule of propaganda, popularly attributed to Nazi propaganda minister Joseph Goebbels, is one of the leading tactics of the American left. Liberals and Democrats deny that any election fraud is occurring, try to make the case that it’s insignificant and irrelevant, or insist that it’s the conservatives and Republicans that are perpetrating the fraud.
By the very nature of the crime, it’s very difficult to produce a smoking gun to show that substantial and egregious election fraud is occurring right under our noses in 2020. Taken alone, the evidence would be considered anecdotal and inconsequential. The “fact checker” industry and the news media is quick to dismiss any charges of voter fraud as unsubstantiated conspiracy theories. What I endeavor to do here is consolidate the mounting evidence of voter fraud to make the case that not only is it real and substantial but that it has reached an overwhelming level and threatens the very foundation of our Republic.
Former U.S. Congressman and Philadelphia Political Operative Pleads Guilty to Election Fraud ChargesAt 1:24 am (6:20:41 into the video) Pennsylvania reported 66% in with Trump leading Biden 2,691,960 to 1,994,274. That's a 16% spread, and in any other election the networks would have called it for Trump easily, because the spread just doesn't change that much between 66% and 100%. one or two points, maybe, but 16 points ? Not possible for Biden to make that up. . . unless you cheat.
Let's do a little math. . .
At 1:24 am (7:06:09 into the video) Pennsylvania reported 74% in with Trump leading Biden 2,956,791 to 2,283,656. A difference of 673,135 votes. if this vote tally is 74%, then 100% of the voters in PA would be 7,081,685. So there are 1,841,238 votes left to be counted. This means that all the remaining votes to be counted would have to break for Biden 2:1, i.e. for every reaming Trump vote, there would have to be two Biden votes (2.16, actually). In a state where Trump is leading by 12 percentage points? Do you even know the slightest thing about statistics? This is simply not possible.
At 12:56 am (5:52:00 into the video) Georgia reported 83% in with Trump leading Biden 2,250,565 to 1,976,548. That's a 6% spread, and in any other election the networks would have called it for Trump easily, because the spread just doesn't change that much between 83% and 100%. one or two points, sure, but 6 points ? Not possible for Biden to make that up. . . unless you cheat.
At 1:20 am (6:17:00 into the video) Michigan reported 60% in with Trump leading Biden 1,827,175 to 1,535,541. That's a 8.5% spread, and in any other election the networks would have called it for Trump easily, because the spread just doesn't change that much between 60% and 100%. one or two points, sure, but 8.5 points ? Not possible for Biden to make that up. . . unless you cheat.
At 2:00 am (6:55:05 into the video) Wisconsin reported 81% in with Trump leading Biden 1,496,350 to 1,379,913. That's a 4% spread, and in any other election the networks would have called it for Trump. I've seen networks call races with less of a spread and less of a percentage counted, and they rarely if ever have turned out wrong, because trends don't change. Theoretically possible for Biden to make this up, but highly unlikely and historically unprecedented.
The tallies were slow from the blue urban areas in all these states, where the vote counting was controlled by Democrats, and they deliberately slowed the process so they could see how many votes they had to manufacture to win.
It was in your face, and the fact that you got the result you wanted shouldn't affect the chilling effect that in the United States of America, the example the rest of the world looks to, a national election was blatantly stolen in front of your face and you don't seem to give a shit. Everything you ever thought this country stood for is made a mockery by this, but hey, it's fine, the orange man with the mean tweets is gone.
